Skip to main content
Rollback to Revision 2
Source Link
1--
  • 280
  • 1
  • 9

Re:A later paper of Beauville (here, preprint from 2000) seems to address your first question, but more generally by taking direct images of vector bundles. He makes the following conjecture:

For semistability, you need a homomorphism from a line bundle U If f: X'-> X is a finite morphism of smooth projective curves and E is a certain degreegeneric vector bundle on X', then f_*E is stable if g(X) \geq 2 and is semistable if g(x) = 1.

The problem is actually equivalent to the pushdownthat of a pushing down a line bundle L, which is the same as having (from a section on Y of f ^ * U ^ * \otimes Ldifferent cover).

This can be expressed in terms of special spaces of divisorsIn the paper, and you can find details worked out explicitly for an example in rank 2he shows that the conjecture holds with some restrictions on L (i.e. a holomorphic double covering f: Y -> Xg. when \chi(X) in pages 103-105 of [NJH,87]is small), although obviously one wants it to hold more generally. He shows, as well, that the conjecture holds as worded above whenever f is an etale covering.

Does this help?

Re: first question.

For semistability, you need a homomorphism from a line bundle U -> X of a certain degree to the pushdown of a line bundle L, which is the same as having a section on Y of f ^ * U ^ * \otimes L.

This can be expressed in terms of special spaces of divisors, and you can find details worked out explicitly for an example in rank 2 (i.e. a holomorphic double covering f: Y -> X) in pages 103-105 of [NJH,87].

A later paper of Beauville (here, preprint from 2000) seems to address your first question, but more generally by taking direct images of vector bundles. He makes the following conjecture:

If f: X'-> X is a finite morphism of smooth projective curves and E is a generic vector bundle on X', then f_*E is stable if g(X) \geq 2 and is semistable if g(x) = 1.

The problem is actually equivalent to that of a pushing down a line bundle L (from a different cover).

In the paper, he shows that the conjecture holds with some restrictions on L (e.g. when \chi(X) is small), although obviously one wants it to hold more generally. He shows, as well, that the conjecture holds as worded above whenever f is an etale covering.

Does this help?

deleted 406 characters in body; added 77 characters in body; added 23 characters in body
Source Link
1--
  • 280
  • 1
  • 9

A later paper of Beauville (here, preprint from 2000) seems to address yourRe: first question, but more generally by taking direct images of vector bundles. He makes the following conjecture:

If f: X'For semistability, you need a homomorphism from a line bundle U -> X is a finite morphism of smooth projective curves and E is a generic vector bundle on X', then f_*E is stable if g(X) \geq 2 and is semistable if g(x) = 1.

The problem is actually equivalentcertain degree to thatthe pushdown of a pushing down a line bundle L (from, which is the same as having a different cover)section on Y of f ^ * U ^ * \otimes L.

In the paperThis can be expressed in terms of special spaces of divisors, he shows that the conjecture holds with some restrictions on Land you can find details worked out explicitly for an example in rank 2 (e.gi. when \chi(X) is small), although obviously one wants it to hold more generallye. He shows, as well, that the conjecture holds as worded above whenever f is an etalea holomorphic double covering f: Y -> X) in pages 103-105 of [NJH,87].

Does this help?

A later paper of Beauville (here, preprint from 2000) seems to address your first question, but more generally by taking direct images of vector bundles. He makes the following conjecture:

If f: X'-> X is a finite morphism of smooth projective curves and E is a generic vector bundle on X', then f_*E is stable if g(X) \geq 2 and is semistable if g(x) = 1.

The problem is actually equivalent to that of a pushing down a line bundle L (from a different cover).

In the paper, he shows that the conjecture holds with some restrictions on L (e.g. when \chi(X) is small), although obviously one wants it to hold more generally. He shows, as well, that the conjecture holds as worded above whenever f is an etale covering.

Does this help?

Re: first question.

For semistability, you need a homomorphism from a line bundle U -> X of a certain degree to the pushdown of a line bundle L, which is the same as having a section on Y of f ^ * U ^ * \otimes L.

This can be expressed in terms of special spaces of divisors, and you can find details worked out explicitly for an example in rank 2 (i.e. a holomorphic double covering f: Y -> X) in pages 103-105 of [NJH,87].

added 137 characters in body
Source Link
1--
  • 280
  • 1
  • 9

A later paper of Beauville (here, preprint from 2000) seems to address your first question, but more generally by taking direct images of vector bundles. He makes the following conjecture:

If f: X'-> X is a finite morphism of smooth projective curves and E is a generic vector bundle on X', then f_*E is stable if g(X) \geq 2 and is semistable if g(x) = 1.

The problem is actually equivalent to that of a pushing down a line bundle L (from a different cover).

In the paper, he provesshows that the conjecture holds with certain restrictions; in particularsome restrictions on L (e.g. when \chi(X) is small), although obviously one wants it to hold more generally. He shows, as well, that the conjecture holds as worded above whenever f is an etale covering.

Does this help?

A later paper of Beauville (here, preprint from 2000) seems to address your first question, but more generally by taking direct images of vector bundles. He makes the following conjecture:

If f: X'-> X is a finite morphism of smooth projective curves and E is a generic vector bundle on X', then f_*E is stable if g(X) \geq 2 and is semistable if g(x) = 1.

The problem is actually equivalent to that of a pushing down a line bundle (from a different cover).

In the paper, he proves the conjecture with certain restrictions; in particular, it holds whenever f is an etale covering.

Does this help?

A later paper of Beauville (here, preprint from 2000) seems to address your first question, but more generally by taking direct images of vector bundles. He makes the following conjecture:

If f: X'-> X is a finite morphism of smooth projective curves and E is a generic vector bundle on X', then f_*E is stable if g(X) \geq 2 and is semistable if g(x) = 1.

The problem is actually equivalent to that of a pushing down a line bundle L (from a different cover).

In the paper, he shows that the conjecture holds with some restrictions on L (e.g. when \chi(X) is small), although obviously one wants it to hold more generally. He shows, as well, that the conjecture holds as worded above whenever f is an etale covering.

Does this help?

Source Link
1--
  • 280
  • 1
  • 9
Loading