Skip to main content

Timeline for A characterization of convexity

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 22, 2010 at 13:22 comment added Victor Protsak Benoît: Yes, the removed region is above the parabola, so the remaining set is on the sides.
Jun 22, 2010 at 12:32 comment added Benoît Kloeckner @Joseph: yes,I guess you're right. @Victor: you mean the region on the sides of the parabola, right?
Jun 22, 2010 at 2:04 comment added Tom Goodwillie Unboundedness is not the issue. Diego Matessi's example can be modified by intersecting with max(|x|,|y|,z)<1.
Jun 22, 2010 at 0:42 comment added Victor Protsak As Tom Goodwillie pointed out, the intersection with $x=z+1$ is disconnected (it is the region above a parabola whose vertex is below the boundary of the half-plane), so this doesn't work, either.
Jun 21, 2010 at 22:15 comment added Victor Protsak Joseph: That's right! It can be fixed by removing a half-cone $\{ (x,y,z): x>0, x^2>y^2+z^2\}$ instead. Then $P\cap X$ is $P_+\setminus Q$, where $P_+$ is a half-plane and $Q$ is empty, a point, a wedge, a region above a parabola or hyperbola, or a an elliptical segment with the chord along the boundary line of $P_+.$
Jun 21, 2010 at 18:49 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @Benoit: Would it not then be possible to choose $P$ slanting so that it clips a bit of the base of the cylinder near the origin, and so creating a hole in $P \cap X$? Maybe I misunderstand what you intend.
Jun 21, 2010 at 16:56 comment added Benoît Kloeckner Nice example, that can be made closed by removing a semi-infinite open cylinder instead of a half-line.
Jun 21, 2010 at 16:47 history answered Diego Matessi CC BY-SA 2.5