Timeline for Two types of criticality
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 5, 2018 at 16:15 | history | edited | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
Jan 5, 2018 at 16:15 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | That's right @Dap, will ask for non-complete graphs | |
Jan 5, 2018 at 14:18 | history | edited | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
Jan 5, 2018 at 14:16 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | Thanks @PeterHeinig, your edits and contributions are always very welcome! I will make the changes you mention in your most recent comment. | |
Jan 5, 2018 at 12:36 | comment | added | Peter Heinig | I shied away from a more invasive edit: to replace ''collapse 2 non-adjacent vertices'' with 'identify two non-adjacent vertices'. The latter I would recommend, because (0) the verb 'collapse' is not usually used with respect to vertices, (1) two use a numeral ('2') for such a statement is not considered good style: in a sense, the number need hardly be emphasized here, for to identify two vertices. Would you mind that edit? | |
Jan 5, 2018 at 12:31 | comment | added | Peter Heinig | Dear @ Dominic van der Zypen: under the hypothesis that the leaving out of the usual technical term was not your intention, I proactively added the usual technical term, and a few things more (noted in the log of the edit). This considerably improves the question, by putting it into the proper context within the recent research literature. | |
Jan 5, 2018 at 12:29 | history | edited | Peter Heinig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Inserted the usual technical term for the invariant the OP is asking about, and a more usual notation; also added a less usual recently coined synonym thereof, together with one relevant reference to the research literature; tags made more specific; formatting improved
|
Jan 5, 2018 at 9:32 | history | edited | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
Jan 1, 2018 at 21:40 | comment | added | domotorp | I suppose you want $G_0$ to have at least $3$ vertices. | |
Dec 29, 2017 at 15:33 | history | edited | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Dec 29, 2017 at 15:30 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | Was the -1 vote due to the bad wording of the original post before the edit, or is there an easy example to what I am asking? | |
Dec 29, 2017 at 14:20 | history | edited | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
Dec 29, 2017 at 13:40 | comment | added | Wojowu | The article you link doesn't define vertex-criticality. | |
Dec 29, 2017 at 13:22 | history | asked | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |