Skip to main content
added 47 characters in body
Source Link
Johnny T.
  • 3.6k
  • 14
  • 29

Let $\Lambda$ be the von Mangoldt function and $\chi$ a primitive character mod $q$, then we have the explicit formula $$ \sum_{n \leq X} \Lambda(n) \chi(n) = \delta_{\chi} X - \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} + O((\frac{X}{T}+1) \log^2(qXT)), $$ where $\delta_{\chi}$ is $1$ if $\chi$ is the principal character and $0$ otherwise, and $\rho$'s are the non-trivial zeros of the $L$ function $L(s, \chi)$. From Let us take $T = X^{a}$ where $0< a < 1$. From this formula we can easily deduce that $$ | \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} | \ll X. $$ I was wondering does the bound still hold if I put the absolute value inside the sum?, i.e. do we have $$ \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} | \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} | \ll X. $$ My guess is that it is true but I was not sure how to see this. Any comments would be appreciated. Thank you very much.

Let $\Lambda$ be the von Mangoldt function and $\chi$ a primitive character mod $q$, then we have the explicit formula $$ \sum_{n \leq X} \Lambda(n) \chi(n) = \delta_{\chi} X - \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} + O((\frac{X}{T}+1) \log^2(qXT)), $$ where $\delta_{\chi}$ is $1$ if $\chi$ is the principal character and $0$ otherwise, and $\rho$'s are the non-trivial zeros of the $L$ function $L(s, \chi)$. From this formula we can easily deduce that $$ | \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} | \ll X. $$ I was wondering does the bound still hold if I put the absolute value inside the sum?, i.e. do we have $$ \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} | \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} | \ll X. $$ My guess is that it is true but I was not sure how to see this. Any comments would be appreciated. Thank you very much.

Let $\Lambda$ be the von Mangoldt function and $\chi$ a primitive character mod $q$, then we have the explicit formula $$ \sum_{n \leq X} \Lambda(n) \chi(n) = \delta_{\chi} X - \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} + O((\frac{X}{T}+1) \log^2(qXT)), $$ where $\delta_{\chi}$ is $1$ if $\chi$ is the principal character and $0$ otherwise, and $\rho$'s are the non-trivial zeros of the $L$ function $L(s, \chi)$. Let us take $T = X^{a}$ where $0< a < 1$. From this formula we can easily deduce that $$ | \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} | \ll X. $$ I was wondering does the bound still hold if I put the absolute value inside the sum?, i.e. do we have $$ \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} | \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} | \ll X. $$ My guess is that it is true but I was not sure how to see this. Any comments would be appreciated. Thank you very much.

Source Link
Johnny T.
  • 3.6k
  • 14
  • 29

Question about the term $\sum_{ \rho} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho}$ in the explicit formula of $\sum_{n \leq X} \Lambda(n) \chi(n)$

Let $\Lambda$ be the von Mangoldt function and $\chi$ a primitive character mod $q$, then we have the explicit formula $$ \sum_{n \leq X} \Lambda(n) \chi(n) = \delta_{\chi} X - \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} + O((\frac{X}{T}+1) \log^2(qXT)), $$ where $\delta_{\chi}$ is $1$ if $\chi$ is the principal character and $0$ otherwise, and $\rho$'s are the non-trivial zeros of the $L$ function $L(s, \chi)$. From this formula we can easily deduce that $$ | \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} | \ll X. $$ I was wondering does the bound still hold if I put the absolute value inside the sum?, i.e. do we have $$ \sum_{ |Im \ \rho| \leq T} | \frac{X^{\rho}}{\rho} | \ll X. $$ My guess is that it is true but I was not sure how to see this. Any comments would be appreciated. Thank you very much.