Timeline for Which pair of mathematicians has the most joint papers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2012 at 10:52 | answer | added | user23201 | timeline score: 16 | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 23:16 | comment | added | Robert K | For a while, I thought Piatetski-Shapiro... | |
| Jul 4, 2011 at 14:42 | comment | added | JRN | @Victor: "You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how." | |
| Jun 27, 2010 at 8:08 | vote | accept | Pete L. Clark | ||
| Jun 21, 2010 at 9:28 | answer | added | S. Okada | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 9:09 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | Pure mathematicians speaking... As someone who takes interest in elections, let me offer a more practical maxim: "It's not the vote that matters, it's (the how of) the count". | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 8:56 | answer | added | Victor Protsak | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 8:43 | answer | added | Victor Protsak | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 7:58 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @James: In the case of a tie, the correct answer will be the complete list of pairs with the maximal number of joint papers. :) | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 4:49 | comment | added | JBorger | Rather, it's most likely unique, and if not, at least there are only finitely many ties. :) | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 3:37 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 157 characters in body
|
| Jun 21, 2010 at 2:33 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Though I don't mind the loss of reputation, I'm not sure why this was made community wiki. This is a question with a unique correct answer... | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 1:55 | comment | added | Greg Kuperberg | It's evidently not a record, but Craig Tracy and Harold Widom have 44 in MathSciNet and I'm sure more in the pipeline. (In MathSciNet, the Borweins only have 25.) | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 1:31 | comment | added | François G. Dorais | So people don't waste too much time checking MathSciNet - George Grätzer and E. T. Schmidt have 59 - Jaroslav Nešetřil and Vojtěch Rödl have 55 - Neil Robertson and Paul Seymour have 53 - Neil Hindman and Dona Strauss have 49 - Yuri Gurevich and Andreas Blass have 44. | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 1:15 | answer | added | user6096 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 0:50 | answer | added | Eric Rowell | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 0:45 | answer | added | Deane Yang | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 21, 2010 at 0:42 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Kim Morrison | ||
| Jun 21, 2010 at 0:22 | comment | added | Deane Yang | The borwein brothers? | |
| Jun 20, 2010 at 23:59 | answer | added | lhf | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 20, 2010 at 23:57 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @OAC: For some reason I feel like revealing the names may spoil the fun for some. But at the same time I worry that the sentiment of the previous sentence is obnoxious, so I clearly can't win on this one. How about some hints: they are both Canadian algebraic number theorists, one in Prince George, the other in Ottawa. | |
| Jun 20, 2010 at 23:50 | comment | added | Omar Antolín-Camarena | Who are the two mathematicians with 80 joint papers you found? | |
| Jun 20, 2010 at 23:47 | history | asked | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |