Timeline for Determinant of a sub-matrix of the classical adjoint
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2017 at 15:59 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Ouch -- I've been looking at the 1st edition (or the 1.5th edition?) all along. The 2nd edition can be found at sites.google.com/site/prasolovskacatmoiknigi . | |
| Dec 26, 2017 at 14:26 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Mail has been sent. | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 21:17 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | @darijgrinberg he welcomes all information about misprints | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 18:02 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Actually, your Yandex link doesn't work for me, but here is Prasolov's Russian version in its 2nd edition: prasolov.loegria.net/linalg.pdf . And yeah, lots of the parentheses should be determinants. Anyone care to tell Prasolov? (While at that, also mention that the chain of inequalities in Theorem 1.2.11.1 is ambiguous, since the commas may either separate inequalities or separate variables.) | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 17:34 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | strange: the Russian version is much more fresh | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 17:23 | vote | accept | Pietro Majer | ||
| Dec 19, 2017 at 17:23 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | (there was a typo, which in the English translation has been fixed) | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 17:04 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | Yes, for determinants. Maybe, your theorem is rather 1.2.6.3 (1.2.6.1 is for angular minors). | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 17:02 | comment | added | darij grinberg | English translation of the 1994 edition. | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 16:04 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Thank you, the proof is very clear from the two formulas in the proof! (The formula in the statement should be an equality between determinants, and so should be the last one, right?) | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 15:27 | history | answered | Fedor Petrov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |