Timeline for Locus where a vector bundle is null
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 21, 2017 at 15:11 | history | edited | j.c. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add reference
|
Dec 21, 2017 at 14:36 | comment | added | Raffaele C | @j.c. Hitchin's Langlands duality and G2 spectral curves, end of page 8 in the arxiv version | |
Dec 21, 2017 at 4:20 | comment | added | Tabes Bridges | @Qfwfq thanks, that's what I was attempting to say, although it seems to be irrelevant in the end. | |
Dec 21, 2017 at 0:18 | comment | added | Qfwfq | @TabesBridges: morphisms ov vector bundles are exactly the same thing as morphisms between (the corresponding locally free) sheaves. What changes is the notion of injective and surjective morphism: for bundles the definitions involve fibers, while for sheaves the definitions involve the stalks. | |
Dec 20, 2017 at 15:12 | comment | added | j.c. | What's the reference to the paper? | |
Dec 20, 2017 at 13:04 | vote | accept | Raffaele C | ||
Dec 20, 2017 at 11:19 | answer | added | Raffaele C | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 18, 2017 at 11:44 | comment | added | Raffaele C | It is for sure a morphism of $O_X$-modules where X is the Riemann surface. Don't know about the locally constant rank. Thanks for the clarification. Anyway, the argument about the kernel being locally free works also in this context as far as I know for Riemann surfaces | |
Dec 18, 2017 at 5:45 | comment | added | Tabes Bridges | Are these vector bundles morphisms, or sheaf homomorphisms? | |
Dec 17, 2017 at 15:24 | history | asked | Raffaele C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |