Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 19, 2017 at 0:37 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn @MikeShulman: ah, you're absolutely right. I was thinking of this definition, but this is characterising a different property.
Dec 18, 2017 at 23:19 comment added Mike Shulman @R.vanDobbendeBruyn In almost all cases I'm aware of, the abstract meaning coincides with the concrete meaning. In derived categories in the homotopy-category sense (e.g. triangulated categories) directed colimits don't generally exist, so you're talking about a different notion anyway. Are you saying there is a category that has real honest directed colimits and a concrete notion of "finitely presentable" that doesn't coincide with this abstract one?
Dec 18, 2017 at 15:16 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn @MikeShulman: for people working with derived categories (say of $A$-modules), the word finitely presentable is not great because it already has a concrete meaning for $A$-modules. This might be why different terminology was chosen, although admittedly I don't know the history.
Dec 18, 2017 at 8:39 comment added Philippe Gaucher The presentable objects in the category of general topological spaces are the discrete ones (it's a very known joke). A topological space is $\lambda$-presentable if and only if it is discrete of cardinal less than $\lambda$. Your question is the case $\lambda=\aleph_0$.
Dec 18, 2017 at 6:47 comment added Mike Shulman This is why I've always disliked the use of the word "compact" for the property in your first paragraph. An alternative, which also has a longer weight of tradition behind it, is "finitely presentable".
Dec 16, 2017 at 23:22 history edited R. van Dobben de Bruyn CC BY-SA 3.0
Wrong implication.
S Dec 16, 2017 at 23:13 answer added R. van Dobben de Bruyn timeline score: 12
S Dec 16, 2017 at 23:13 history asked R. van Dobben de Bruyn CC BY-SA 3.0