Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 30, 2018 at 11:29 comment added Watson It is stated as Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture in Beilinson's Height pairings between algebraic cycles (conjecture 5.0).
Dec 16, 2017 at 18:48 answer added guest timeline score: 4
Dec 16, 2017 at 13:37 answer added Lucifer timeline score: 7
Dec 16, 2017 at 8:51 answer added David Loeffler timeline score: 12
Dec 16, 2017 at 6:21 comment added user19475 I have found math.clemson.edu/~jimlb/ConferenceTalks/PCMI2009/kings.pdf p. 8 and 9.
Dec 16, 2017 at 3:06 history edited gdb
edited tags
Dec 16, 2017 at 3:03 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn @gdb my thoughts as well. Although I think the same is conjectured over finite fields, where we also don't know anything. In that case it really does seem to follow from Bass.
Dec 16, 2017 at 2:59 comment added gdb @Mohan I think that Bass conjecture is not precisely the same conjecture as one I am asking about. The reason is that varieties over number fields are not schemes of finite type over $\mathbf Z$. And I am not sure how spreading out techniques work for $K$-theory/Chow groups.
Dec 16, 2017 at 2:50 history edited gdb CC BY-SA 3.0
added 155 characters in body
Dec 16, 2017 at 2:34 comment added Mohan For any smooth variety $X$, you have a filtration $\{F^iK_0(X)\}$ of the $K_0$ and natural identification of $F^i/F^{i+1}\otimes \mathbb{Q}$ with $CH^i(X)\otimes\mathbb{Q}$, by Grothendieck Rieman-Roch without denominators. So, Bass conjecture for $K_0$ is equivalent to what you ask. I do not know how much is known for either.
Dec 16, 2017 at 1:37 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn This might be related to Bass's conjecture. I am not really an expert, though.
Dec 16, 2017 at 1:07 history edited gdb CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Dec 16, 2017 at 0:57 history asked gdb CC BY-SA 3.0