Timeline for The defining characteristic representations of Lie type groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 8, 2017 at 0:03 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | Note that your Question 1 has a familiar answer, though Question 2 was dealt with much more recently in a precise way. (In general, it's best here to formulate a single question.) | |
Dec 8, 2017 at 0:01 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 6 | |
Dec 7, 2017 at 16:46 | vote | accept | user148212 | ||
Dec 7, 2017 at 15:38 | answer | added | Jay Taylor | timeline score: 7 | |
Dec 7, 2017 at 8:54 | comment | added | user148212 | @JayTaylor Thank you! This is very useful. Could you put this into an answer? | |
Dec 7, 2017 at 6:39 | comment | added | Jay Taylor | This is false for a general connected reductive algebraic group but is true if the group is simple and simply connected. This is discussed in Steinberg's "Endomorphisms of linear algebraic groups". Parametrising the simple modules in the general case is disussed by Brunat and Lübeck in the following paper arxiv.org/pdf/1211.3692.pdf. | |
Dec 7, 2017 at 6:00 | history | asked | user148212 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |