Timeline for Why is $K_{\upsilon}|K$ separable for a global field $K$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 29, 2017 at 10:27 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 29, 2017 at 10:30 | |||||
Dec 9, 2017 at 15:30 | vote | accept | Frida | ||
Dec 7, 2017 at 1:23 | answer | added | Count Dracula | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 6, 2017 at 21:16 | answer | added | nfdc23 | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 6, 2017 at 18:25 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 6, 2017 at 18:13 | comment | added | Jason Starr | Also, closely related to this is the fact that an excellent Noetherian local ring that is reduced is analytically reduced, i.e., the completion is also reduced. | |
Dec 6, 2017 at 18:11 | comment | added | Jason Starr | I do not have with me Serre's Local Fields. However, I would just like to point out that for the only positive characteristic global fields, i.e., for finite extensions $K$ of $\mathbb{F}_p(T)$, for every finite extension $L/K$, the integral closure of the DVR $\mathbb{F}_p[T]_{\langle T\rangle}$ in $L$ is finite over the DVR. This is a corollary of the Noether Normalization Theorem. You can find an explicit statement in Eisenbud's Commutative Algebra soon after the proof of the Noether Normalization Theorem. | |
Dec 6, 2017 at 18:04 | history | asked | Frida | CC BY-SA 3.0 |