Timeline for Absolute continuity of measures on infinite binary sequences
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2017 at 20:51 | answer | added | fedja | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 19:48 | answer | added | R W | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 19:22 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 6, 2017 at 3:21 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2017 at 19:19 | comment | added | pdbl | @fedja Yes, it seems clear we should assume independence. Otherwise, as you said, the problem does not really make sense. | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 19:16 | comment | added | fedja | The conditions are not enough to describe the probability measures completely even on $\Omega^2$, so the "if" part requires extra conditions.for sure, and if you think about it, the "only if" part too (all $p_k=p, q_k=q$ and the measures are just the sums of $2$ point masses, one at $(1,1,1,\dots)$ and another at $(0,0,0,\dots)$. So, do we assume independence of $\omega_k$? | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 18:54 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 5, 2017 at 19:06 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2017 at 18:51 | history | asked | pdbl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |