Timeline for A question about finite free convolution
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 5, 2017 at 17:45 | answer | added | Iosif Pinelis | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 5, 2017 at 1:21 | comment | added | gradstudent | Yes, if needed assume $M$ has constant row sum of $1$. I have made all of them $\chi_x(M)$. That was a notation mistake. This is part of the proof here, cs.yale.edu/homes/spielman/561/lect24-15.pdf | |
Dec 5, 2017 at 1:16 | history | edited | gradstudent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Dec 4, 2017 at 23:04 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | A few questions: (i) Is $M$ supposed to have constant row sums as well? (ii) Is $\chi(M)$ the same as $\chi_x(M)$? (iii) What are reasons to believe the proposed identity is true? | |
Dec 4, 2017 at 16:57 | history | asked | gradstudent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |