Timeline for When can we force two frames to be homeomorphic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 25, 2017 at 21:37 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
Nov 25, 2017 at 20:58 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 499 characters in body
|
Nov 25, 2017 at 20:57 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | A frame is a complete lattice in which finite meets distribute over arbitrary joins. A morphism of frames is a poset map map that preserves finite meets and arbitrary joins. | |
Nov 25, 2017 at 20:50 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 499 characters in body
|
Nov 25, 2017 at 20:42 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | What do you mean by "frame" in this question? | |
Nov 25, 2017 at 20:42 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | One might mention that in the structure case, two structures are forceably isomorphic if and only if they are isomorphic in the forcing extension in which they both become countable. So one doesn't need to guess which forcing notion might do it. Another thing is that there is also a game-theoretic characterization: structures $A$ and $B$ are isomorphic in a forcing extension if and only if player II has a winning strategy in the game to build a partial isomorphism (like a pebble game), where player I challenges with new points in the domain or range and player II plays corresponding points. | |
Nov 25, 2017 at 19:43 | history | asked | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |