Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 23, 2017 at 17:54 history closed YCor
Neil Strickland
Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta
user1073
Ramiro de la Vega
Not suitable for this site
Nov 23, 2017 at 13:06 comment added YCor Additional exercise: there's a countable subset of $\mathrm{Cont}(\mathbf{R},\mathbf{R})$ that is dense in $\mathbf{R}^\mathbf{R}$.
Nov 23, 2017 at 12:37 comment added YCor "this argument" is indeed not well-written: it should be "a non-Borel self-map of $\mathbf{R}$ is not the pointwise limit of a sequence of continuous functions". This example shows that one has to be careful with dealing with limits in non-metrizable spaces, such as, typically, uncountable products.
Nov 23, 2017 at 11:25 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
typo
Nov 23, 2017 at 10:43 review Close votes
Nov 23, 2017 at 17:54
Nov 23, 2017 at 10:24 vote accept Dominic van der Zypen
Nov 23, 2017 at 10:18 vote accept Dominic van der Zypen
Nov 23, 2017 at 10:24
Nov 23, 2017 at 10:05 comment added Jochen Glueck @Phil-W I think, this argument only shows that $\operatorname{Cont}(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ is not sequentially dense in $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}}$.
Nov 23, 2017 at 10:05 answer added Taras Banakh timeline score: 14
Nov 23, 2017 at 10:03 answer added Jochen Glueck timeline score: 10
Nov 23, 2017 at 9:54 comment added Dominic van der Zypen If you can elaborate on this a bit, you can post it as an answer and we can close this thread.
Nov 23, 2017 at 9:51 comment added Phil-W I would say no, since a non Borel self-map of $\mathbb{R}$ is not the limit by pointwise convergence of continuous functions.
Nov 23, 2017 at 9:33 history asked Dominic van der Zypen CC BY-SA 3.0