Timeline for Birational automorphisms of varieties of Picard number one
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2018 at 14:28 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 27, 2017 at 15:45 | comment | added | Pooter | @JasonStarr: at least it was an interesting way of constructing the identity. | |
| Nov 24, 2017 at 19:52 | comment | added | Jason Starr | The rational transformation in my example was actually the identity map :( | |
| Nov 24, 2017 at 14:01 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 24, 2017 at 23:27 | |||||
| Nov 24, 2017 at 13:43 | comment | added | Jérémy Blanc | Possible duplicate of Pseudo-automorphisms on Fano varieties | |
| Nov 24, 2017 at 13:33 | answer | added | Pooter | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 24, 2017 at 9:49 | comment | added | Pooter | There was an answer with an counterexample that is now deleted. The counterexample was not correct, but there was also a comment by Jason Starr on the answer giving another counterexample; I would like to know if that counterexample was correct or not. (To show my hand, I think the answer to the OP's question is yes, but I do not yet see what was the issue with Jason Starr's counterexample.) | |
| Nov 22, 2017 at 21:46 | comment | added | user21574 | Anyway, I think their definition as " p-th relative dynamical degree" is not so fine, in fact integral must be taken on M/B and we must use fiberwise Kahler form like $\omega_{M/B}$(which is not Kahler in general) instead. to define such p-th-relative dynmical degree . See p.4 perso.univ-rennes1.fr/serge.cantat/Documents/… . But you check yourself. (this is just my opinion ) | |
| Nov 22, 2017 at 21:27 | comment | added | user21574 | Your question is related to Sibony-Dinh theory see link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00208-013-0992-4 and annals.math.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/… | |
| Nov 22, 2017 at 21:15 | history | asked | user91659 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |