Skip to main content
edited tags
Source Link
Joel David Hamkins
  • 236.5k
  • 44
  • 777
  • 1.4k

Am I allowed to say "first-order VopenkaVopěnka cardinal"?

For a cardinal $\kappa$ such that $V_{\kappa}$ satisfies Vopenka'sVopěnka's principle as a first-order axiom schema, am I allowed to say "first-order VopenkaVopěnka cardinal", or is there any kind of standard term for it?

Am I allowed to say "first-order Vopenka cardinal"?

For a cardinal $\kappa$ such that $V_{\kappa}$ satisfies Vopenka's principle as a first-order axiom schema, am I allowed to say "first-order Vopenka cardinal", or is there any kind of standard term for it?

Am I allowed to say "first-order Vopěnka cardinal"?

For a cardinal $\kappa$ such that $V_{\kappa}$ satisfies Vopěnka's principle as a first-order axiom schema, am I allowed to say "first-order Vopěnka cardinal", or is there any kind of standard term for it?

Source Link
Rupert
  • 2.1k
  • 12
  • 15

Am I allowed to say "first-order Vopenka cardinal"?

For a cardinal $\kappa$ such that $V_{\kappa}$ satisfies Vopenka's principle as a first-order axiom schema, am I allowed to say "first-order Vopenka cardinal", or is there any kind of standard term for it?