Timeline for Condition for non-vanishing trace
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Nov 20, 2017 at 14:51 | vote | accept | Ludwig | ||
| S Nov 20, 2017 at 14:51 | history | suggested | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor improvements.
|
| Nov 20, 2017 at 14:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 20, 2017 at 14:51 | |||||
| Nov 20, 2017 at 14:12 | answer | added | Fedor Petrov | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 20, 2017 at 13:51 | comment | added | user83457 | since replacing X with -X multiplies trace by -1 it is the same as asking if there is a non-zero. It is a linear function of X and this will be the case unless all coefficients of X are 0. Have you tried writing them down ? | |
| Nov 20, 2017 at 13:30 | history | asked | Ludwig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |