Timeline for Why does the type-A subdivision algebra look like the Rota-Baxter algebra axiom?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2017 at 15:40 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 20, 2017 at 11:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 20, 2017 at 10:24 | answer | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 20, 2017 at 10:17 | comment | added | darij grinberg | @VladimirDotsenko: Nope. Maybe I should have said that I mean the "big" Orlik-Terao algebra, not the "small" one (i.e., my variables aren't nilpotent or anything like that). | |
| Nov 20, 2017 at 10:10 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | Don't you also want to impose (in the second more symmetric presentation) relations $x_{ij}x_{ji}=0$, or something like this? | |
| Nov 20, 2017 at 9:45 | history | asked | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |