Timeline for A question concerning Tauberian theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 4, 2017 at 20:43 | vote | accept | Johann Franke | ||
Nov 20, 2017 at 16:51 | answer | added | js21 | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 20, 2017 at 14:31 | comment | added | Johann Franke | This is interesting. In fact I know that the residues of all possible poles are bounded by a constant $K$ only dependent on the $\epsilon_0$ above (I also know that all poles of $D(s)$ have at most order $k$) such that $\Gamma(s)D(s)$ is kind of fast decreasing. Also I assume that there should be a pole free region which approaches the line $\Re(s) = 1$ when $t \to \infty$, but I haven't shown this yet. Does the inverse Mellin transform suffice to show the question? | |
Nov 20, 2017 at 14:16 | comment | added | Johann Franke | Thank you very much so far. I am familiar with Delange's theorem but unfortunately the leading term does not suffice in my case. | |
Nov 19, 2017 at 23:22 | comment | added | reuns | The $o(x)$ term depends on the density of poles and their residues. The first question is if $\Gamma(s) D(s)$ is fast decreasing so that $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n e^{-nx} = \sum_\beta x^{-\beta} P_\beta(\log x) +o(x^{-1+\epsilon})$ as $x \to 0$ | |
Nov 19, 2017 at 15:58 | comment | added | Peter Humphries | Delange's generalisation of Ikehara's Tauberian theorem gives you the leading order term, at the very least. | |
Nov 19, 2017 at 15:24 | history | edited | Johann Franke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 31 characters in body
|
Nov 19, 2017 at 15:11 | history | asked | Johann Franke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |