Skip to main content
deleted superfluous exclam
Link
Gerry Myerson
  • 39.9k
  • 10
  • 186
  • 247

A criterion for second countability!

edited tags
Link
ABB
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 19
edited tags
Source Link
ABB
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 19

Let $(X,\tau)$ be a topological space.

Assume for any arbitrary topological base $\mathcal{E}$ of $\tau$ we have that: the Borel sigma algebras coming form $\mathcal{E}$ and $\tau$ are the same. Can we conclude that $X$ is second countable ?!

This question is also asked when $X$ is a locally convex space. Please read the comments below.

Let $(X,\tau)$ be a topological space.

Assume for any arbitrary topological base $\mathcal{E}$ of $\tau$ we have that: the Borel sigma algebras coming form $\mathcal{E}$ and $\tau$ are the same. Can we conclude that $X$ is second countable ?!

Let $(X,\tau)$ be a topological space.

Assume for any arbitrary topological base $\mathcal{E}$ of $\tau$ we have that: the Borel sigma algebras coming form $\mathcal{E}$ and $\tau$ are the same. Can we conclude that $X$ is second countable ?!

This question is also asked when $X$ is a locally convex space. Please read the comments below.

Fixes typo in the title
Link
Luc Guyot
  • 7.9k
  • 2
  • 30
  • 51
Loading
added 18 characters in body
Source Link
ABB
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 19
Loading
Source Link
ABB
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 19
Loading