Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 9, 2017 at 9:40 history closed Andreas Blass
abx
Alex Degtyarev
R.P.
Stefan Kohl
Not suitable for this site
Nov 9, 2017 at 6:39 answer added David Roberts timeline score: 1
Nov 9, 2017 at 6:17 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე It would make much more sense then to state this specific instance in the question and then ask whether it can be made abstract nonsense, rather than starting with abstract nonsense from which the original motivation cannot be guessed at all.
Nov 9, 2017 at 1:40 history edited clanijos CC BY-SA 3.0
added 91 characters in body
Nov 9, 2017 at 1:30 review Close votes
Nov 9, 2017 at 9:40
Nov 9, 2017 at 1:21 comment added clanijos Hochster in his paper "Prime ideal structure in commutative rings", proves that Spec(_) is 'invertible' in the sense I've stated in the original post on the full subcategory of the category of spectral spaces consisting of $T_1$ spectral spaces. I'm interested in recovering rings from objects in a full subcategory of that subcategory.
Nov 9, 2017 at 1:14 comment added clanijos Yes, I did mean $G(\mathscr{B})\cong\mathscr{A}$. Thank you for the counterexample, it is much appreciated.
Nov 9, 2017 at 1:06 comment added Qiaochu Yuan The question does not make any sense as written; $b = F(a)$ is an object of $B$ so we can't apply $F$ to it. If the intended question was $G(b) \cong a$, there is already no reason for this to be true when $A, B, C$ are discrete categories (so, sets); take $G$ to be the inclusion of a point and $a$ to be anything outside the image of $G$. What is your motivation?
Nov 9, 2017 at 0:56 history edited Chris Godsil CC BY-SA 3.0
typo -1
Nov 9, 2017 at 0:17 review First posts
Nov 9, 2017 at 0:56
Nov 9, 2017 at 0:16 history asked clanijos CC BY-SA 3.0