Timeline for A modification of the Ljunggren-Nagell equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 8, 2017 at 19:47 | vote | accept | Pace Nielsen | ||
Nov 8, 2017 at 17:28 | comment | added | Pace Nielsen | Here is an even easier solution in the latter case: If $k$ is odd, we cannot have $(a^k-1)/(a-1)$ twice a square. But if $k$ is even, then $a^k+1$ cannot be a square, since integer squares are more than one apart (for $a>1$). | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 16:24 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | $a^k+1=c^2$ was done long before Mihailescu in elementary and short way, see E. Z. Chein, Proc. AMS 56 (1976), pp. 83-84. | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 16:15 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | If $a$ is odd, than $m$ and $(a^m-1)/(a-1)=1+a+\dots+a^{m-1}$ have the the same parity, we do not need theorems for seeing this. | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 14:59 | history | edited | Max Alekseyev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2017 at 14:57 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | @PaceNielsen: Mihailescu's theorem may be an overkill here, but it's the most straightforward approach. Alternatively, one can get the same result by factoring $a^k=(c-1)(c+1)$. | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 14:53 | history | edited | Max Alekseyev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
links
|
Nov 8, 2017 at 14:51 | comment | added | Pace Nielsen | This is really nice, although it pulls out the big guns by appealing to Mihailescu's theorem! In my work I also need the cases when the right-hand side is $3b^2$ or $6b^2$. It looks like the $6b^2$ case should be similar, but I'll give them a try using your ideas. | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 14:43 | history | answered | Max Alekseyev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |