Timeline for Extra principal Cartier divisors on non-Noetherian rings? (answered: no!)
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jun 18, 2010 at 17:39 | history | edited | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
title
|
| Jun 18, 2010 at 17:35 | vote | accept | Andrew Critch | ||
| Jun 18, 2010 at 17:29 | history | edited | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
follow-up to comments; added 8 characters in body
|
| Jun 18, 2010 at 2:08 | answer | added | BCnrd | timeline score: 21 | |
| Jun 17, 2010 at 22:49 | comment | added | Qing Liu | The definition of $\cal K'$ in my book edition 2002 is not correct (though I knew that EGA IV.20.1.3 is wrong and wrote an example where $Frac(O_{X,x})$ is different from $\cal K_x$!). The correct definition can be found in my 2006's paperback edition (see errata on my webpage). I learned the paper of Kleiman mentionned by Georges only last year from Gabber. :( | |
| Jun 17, 2010 at 20:38 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jun 17, 2010 at 19:38 | history | edited | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
removed second footnote; it was incorrect, the constructions are the same.
|
| Jun 17, 2010 at 18:55 | history | asked | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |