Timeline for Loop space in Topological sense v.s. Categorical sense
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 8, 2017 at 11:50 | comment | added | Denis Nardin | Another way of seeing it. is that a map into the homotopy pullback of $A\leftarrow B\rightarrow C$ is the same thing as a map to $A$, a map to $C$ and a homotopy of their postcompositions to $B$. Plugging in the diagram $*\to X\leftarrow *$ you see that a map to the homotopy pullback is a homotopy of the constant map to itself, that is a map to $\Omega X$. | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 11:17 | comment | added | Sam Gunningham | Not sure if you have already understood this, but if you want to compute the homotopy pullback correctly, you can replace one of the $\{\ast\}$ with the path space $PX$ (paths starting at $\ast$). The path space is contractible, and $PX\to X$ (which sends a path to its endpoint) is a fibration. Thus the homotopy pullback can be computed as the naive fiber product of $PX \times_X \{\ast\}$ which is exactly $\Omega X$. The homotopy pullback models the pullback in the sense of $(\infty,1)$-categories. | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 5:09 | comment | added | Y. S | That's the misunderstanding I made! | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 4:53 | comment | added | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | $(\infty,1)$-categories have $(\infty,1)$-pullbacks, in general you should not expect them to have "ordinary" pullbacks | |
Nov 8, 2017 at 4:40 | history | asked | Y. S | CC BY-SA 3.0 |