Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Tom Mrowka
Tom Mrowka
  • 3.4k
  • 1
  • 25
  • 20

Its nice to look also at Bott's early paper "On symmetric products and the Steenrod squares. " Ann. of Math. (2) 57, (1953). 579–590.

He uses an early version of Smith theory. Depending on how you do Smith Theory the homotopy quotient construction lurkyinglurking somewhere. Anyway worth look.

Its nice to look also at Bott's early paper "On symmetric products and the Steenrod squares. " Ann. of Math. (2) 57, (1953). 579–590.

He uses an early version of Smith theory. Depending on how you do Smith Theory the homotopy quotient construction lurkying somewhere. Anyway worth look.

Its nice to look also at Bott's early paper "On symmetric products and the Steenrod squares. " Ann. of Math. (2) 57, (1953). 579–590.

He uses an early version of Smith theory. Depending on how you do Smith Theory the homotopy quotient construction lurking somewhere. Anyway worth look.

Source Link
Tom Mrowka
Tom Mrowka
  • 3.4k
  • 1
  • 25
  • 20

Its nice to look also at Bott's early paper "On symmetric products and the Steenrod squares. " Ann. of Math. (2) 57, (1953). 579–590.

He uses an early version of Smith theory. Depending on how you do Smith Theory the homotopy quotient construction lurkying somewhere. Anyway worth look.