Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ relate to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (on the analytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).

    How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ relate to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (on the analytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).

  2. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

  1. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ relate to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (on the analytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).
  1. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ relate to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (on the analytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).

  2. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Saal Hardali
  • 7.8k
  • 3
  • 43
  • 99

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ relatedrelate to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (on the analytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).
  1. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ related to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (on the analytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).
  1. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ relate to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (on the analytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).
  1. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

Notice added Draw attention by Saal Hardali
Bounty Started worth 100 reputation by Saal Hardali
added 15 characters in body
Source Link
Saal Hardali
  • 7.8k
  • 3
  • 43
  • 99

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ withrelated to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (ofon the analytificationanalytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).
  1. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ with Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (of the analytification of $X$ of course).
  1. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in there. Let me describe the construction:

Let $A$ be an almost commutative algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ (positively filtered whose associated graded is of finite type). Denote by $\sigma: A \to grA$ the multiplicative map sending an element to its corresponding "symbol" in the associated graded.

The following proposition is proved about ore localizations in this context:

Proposition: Let $\tilde{S} \subset grA$ be a multiplicatively closed subset. Then $S = \{a \in A : \sigma(a) \in \tilde{S} \}$ satisfies ore conditions. Meaning there exists a noncommutative localization $S^{-1}A$.

He then introduces a $\mathbb{Z}$-filtration on $S^{-1}A$ naturally as follows:

$$(S^{-1}A)_n = \{s^{-1}a \in S^{-1}A : deg\sigma(a)-deg\sigma(s)=n \}$$

Definition: The completion of $S^{-1}A$ w.r.t. the filtration defined above is called formal microlocalization of $A$ at $S$ and denoted $A_S$.

Further arguments show $U \to A_U$ defines a sheaf of algebras on the affine scheme $Spec(grA)$ And that for any finitely generated $A$-module the assignment $U \to M_U := A_U \otimes_A M$ defines a sheaf of modules over it.

It seems to me that this construction can be generalized to give microlocalization of $\mathcal{D}_X$ for general smooth varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. Let's denote by $\mathcal{E}_X$ the sheaf obtained from the procedure above applied to $\mathcal{D}_X$.

It therefore raises the questions:

  1. How does the sheaf $\mathcal{E}_X$ related to Sato's sheaf of formal microdifferential operators? (on the analytic cotanget bundle of $X$ of course).
  1. Can $\mathcal{E}_X$ be described explicitly (generators and relations) in simple examples? ($Spec \mathbb{C}[[x]], Spec \mathbb{C}[x], \mathbb{A}^n$).

And finally:

Is this algebraic side of microlocalization developed anywhere in the literature? If so where?

Source Link
Saal Hardali
  • 7.8k
  • 3
  • 43
  • 99
Loading