Timeline for Asymptotic growth of the of Taylor coefficients of the inverse of a function
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2017 at 19:16 | history | edited | user116726 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 1, 2017 at 18:18 | comment | added | user116726 | Great - thanks for the information. I had a more specific function in mind, and the radius of the disk you mentioned gave me the bound I desire. | |
| Nov 1, 2017 at 18:14 | history | edited | user116726 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 1, 2017 at 13:37 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 1, 2017 at 23:02 | |||||
| Nov 1, 2017 at 13:24 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | To talk about inverse function at $0$ you need first of all that $f(0)=0$, that is $c_0=0$. Then the rate of coefficients of the inverse function is regulated by the radius of the largest disk centered at $0$ in which this inverse function exists. And this has nothing to do with the rate of $c_n$. Even when $c_n$ is a finite sequence, the rate of the coefficients of the inverse can be anything. | |
| Nov 1, 2017 at 10:03 | vote | accept | user116726 | ||
| Nov 1, 2017 at 9:47 | history | edited | user116726 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 1, 2017 at 8:36 | answer | added | Peter Michor | timeline score: 4 | |
| S Nov 1, 2017 at 6:54 | history | suggested | Ali Taghavi |
I add two tags.
|
|
| Nov 1, 2017 at 6:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 1, 2017 at 6:54 | |||||
| Nov 1, 2017 at 6:24 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 1, 2017 at 7:19 | |||||
| Nov 1, 2017 at 6:22 | history | asked | user116726 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |