Timeline for Tracing the word “form”
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 20, 2020 at 18:35 | vote | accept | Francois Ziegler | ||
| Oct 29, 2017 at 22:05 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Oct 29, 2017 at 13:49 | comment | added | Francois Ziegler | The quote (now literal) nicely explains Kronecker’s motives — but he must have been “blaming” someone else in 1866, before Jordan appeared. Elsewhere Brechenmacher (2007, footnote 3) describes Jordan’s 1874 switch to “form” as almost political; I wonder why he (and Jahrbuch, Kronecker) keep misquoting Christoffel’s 1868 Theorie der bilinearen Functionen as bilinearen Formen? | |
| Oct 28, 2017 at 21:56 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
make quote exact
|
| Oct 28, 2017 at 16:56 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 47 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2017 at 16:55 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | indeed, this is not a literal quote but my attempt to summarize several pages of text into something that would be appropriate for the MO answer box; I have removed the "quote" formatting to avoid suggesting that this is quoted verbatim. | |
| Oct 28, 2017 at 16:09 | comment | added | Francois Ziegler | Thank you. (Your text seems to differ significantly from both the arXiv and the published version?!) | |
| Oct 28, 2017 at 16:08 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 92 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2017 at 15:40 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2017 at 15:36 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2017 at 15:27 | history | answered | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |