Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 18, 2017 at 20:08 vote accept glS
Oct 26, 2017 at 11:47 comment added Gerry Myerson Existence of a small change is not equivalent to measure zero. E.g., given any irrational, there's an arbitrarily small change that makes it rational, but the irrationals have full measure.
Oct 26, 2017 at 11:36 comment added glS @GerryMyerson oh right of course. I meant to say that there exists a small change such that (...), which should be equivalent to say that the set of non-solvable systems has measure zero (in some properly defined metric over the parameters). I'll fix that bit
Oct 26, 2017 at 11:34 comment added Gerry Myerson Even in the linear case, if $A$ is singular, there exist arbitrarily small changes that keep it singular. E.g., multiply it by $1+\epsilon$ for $\epsilon$ arbitrarily small.
Oct 26, 2017 at 11:22 comment added glS @GerryMyerson care to expand a little bit? Isn't this in contrast to Igor's answer?
Oct 25, 2017 at 22:07 comment added Gerry Myerson "is it always true that an infinitesimal change of parameters will give me a system which has solutions?" It is always true that there exists an infinitesimal change, etc., etc.; it is not always true that every infinitesimal change etc., etc.
Oct 25, 2017 at 14:55 answer added Igor Rivin timeline score: 16
Oct 25, 2017 at 14:00 history edited glS CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Oct 25, 2017 at 13:53 history asked glS CC BY-SA 3.0