Timeline for Automatically extract a bibitem (not BibTeX!) from MathSciNet?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 5:22 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 19, 2017 at 11:27 | |||||
| Jun 17, 2010 at 5:40 | comment | added | Kevin O'Bryant | If what you need is a self-contained file (for archiving or email purposes), then you might like to use the amsrefs package. Math Sci-Net will output in this format, so there's little fuss. | |
| Jun 16, 2010 at 23:12 | vote | accept | Andreas Holmstrom | ||
| Jun 16, 2010 at 22:34 | answer | added | Willie Wong | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 16, 2010 at 22:23 | comment | added | Willie Wong | To add to Jose's comment, rather than citing every item in your tex file, you can use something like listbib mirror.ox.ac.uk/sites/ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/listbib to make listing of the entire bibtex database. | |
| Jun 16, 2010 at 22:19 | answer | added | Matthew Morrow | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jun 16, 2010 at 22:13 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | Is there no bibliography style which matches or at least resembles closely the desired format for the bibitems? If there were, you could get the data in bibtex format, compile it as you would normally and then, if necessary, tweak by hand the resulting .bbl file. | |
| Jun 16, 2010 at 21:55 | comment | added | Wadim Zudilin | How a "small thing" can "take a lot of time"? Is it big small? Doing things manually is keeping them under your own control (as well as giving them your "heart"). | |
| Jun 16, 2010 at 21:38 | history | asked | Andreas Holmstrom | CC BY-SA 2.5 |