Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 28, 2021 at 6:51 history edited Martin Sleziak
edited tags
Nov 7, 2017 at 17:55 vote accept Cusp
Oct 29, 2017 at 14:20 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
Replaced the newly created (and ambiguous) tag by already existing (local-rings)
Oct 23, 2017 at 12:56 comment added Wille Liu Let $\hat R$ denote the completion of $R$. Then for all $n\in \mathbf{N}$ we have $R/\mathfrak{m}^n\cong \hat R/\hat{\mathfrak{m}}^n$. We know that $\mathfrak{m}^{dp^e}\subseteq \mathfrak{m}^{[p^e]}$ and $\hat{\mathfrak m}^{dp^e}\subseteq \hat{\mathfrak{m}}^{[p^e]}$. The image of $\mathfrak{m}^{[p^e]}$ in $R/\mathfrak{m}^{dp^e}$ is identified with the image of $\hat{\mathfrak{m}}^{[p^e]}$ in $\hat R/\hat{\mathfrak{m}}^{dp^e}$. It amounts thus to determine the length for $(\hat R, \hat{\mathfrak{m}})$. Finally, the Cohen structure theorem implies $\hat R\cong (R/\mathfrak{m})[[x_1, ..., x_d]]$.
Oct 23, 2017 at 12:17 comment added Cusp @WilleLiou It would be helpful if you kindly explain it more.
Oct 23, 2017 at 11:16 comment added Wille Liu Take the completion w.r.t. the maximal ideal and use the Cohen structure theorem, which reduces the task to formal power series rings, for which the result is evident.
Oct 23, 2017 at 11:00 history edited Cusp CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Oct 23, 2017 at 10:47 answer added js21 timeline score: 3
Oct 23, 2017 at 8:20 history asked Cusp CC BY-SA 3.0