Timeline for Length of a module and Frobenius map
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 28, 2021 at 6:51 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
edited tags
|
|
Nov 7, 2017 at 17:55 | vote | accept | Cusp | ||
Oct 29, 2017 at 14:20 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Replaced the newly created (and ambiguous) tag by already existing (local-rings)
|
Oct 23, 2017 at 12:56 | comment | added | Wille Liu | Let $\hat R$ denote the completion of $R$. Then for all $n\in \mathbf{N}$ we have $R/\mathfrak{m}^n\cong \hat R/\hat{\mathfrak{m}}^n$. We know that $\mathfrak{m}^{dp^e}\subseteq \mathfrak{m}^{[p^e]}$ and $\hat{\mathfrak m}^{dp^e}\subseteq \hat{\mathfrak{m}}^{[p^e]}$. The image of $\mathfrak{m}^{[p^e]}$ in $R/\mathfrak{m}^{dp^e}$ is identified with the image of $\hat{\mathfrak{m}}^{[p^e]}$ in $\hat R/\hat{\mathfrak{m}}^{dp^e}$. It amounts thus to determine the length for $(\hat R, \hat{\mathfrak{m}})$. Finally, the Cohen structure theorem implies $\hat R\cong (R/\mathfrak{m})[[x_1, ..., x_d]]$. | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 12:17 | comment | added | Cusp | @WilleLiou It would be helpful if you kindly explain it more. | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 11:16 | comment | added | Wille Liu | Take the completion w.r.t. the maximal ideal and use the Cohen structure theorem, which reduces the task to formal power series rings, for which the result is evident. | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 11:00 | history | edited | Cusp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
Oct 23, 2017 at 10:47 | answer | added | js21 | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 8:20 | history | asked | Cusp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |