Timeline for Closed-form solution for an integral involving the p.d.f. and c.d.f. of a $N(0,1)$-distributed random variable
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 4, 2021 at 5:34 | comment | added | jvdillon |
FYI, the condition in the OwenT derivation is wrong. It should be -(a/w<0) and not -(a<=0) . The conclusion can be derived from 10,010.3 of Owen's paper and using the property $T(u,v) + T(uv,1/v) = \frac{1}{2} (\Phi(u) + \Phi(uv)) - \Phi(u) \Phi(uv) - \frac{1}{2} [v<0]$.
|
|
Oct 22, 2017 at 2:21 | comment | added | Student1981 | I appreciate your observation, @MattF. I believe I did not choose well my words when I wrote "closed-form solution". I will be more careful next time. However, for my purposes, the approach of Stéphane Laurent's answer is good enough. | |
Oct 22, 2017 at 1:03 | comment | added | user44143 | These are efficient reductions of the integral to standard libraries. But I'd say a solution with the bivariate normal CDF or OwenT is not in closed form; I would restrict the term "closed-form" to quantities that can be calculated with at most a single integral of elementary functions. | |
Oct 21, 2017 at 10:18 | comment | added | Stéphane Laurent |
@Student1981 I've just added a speed comparison in my answer. OwenT is the way to go.
|
|
Oct 21, 2017 at 10:17 | history | edited | Stéphane Laurent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
benchmark
|
Oct 21, 2017 at 2:06 | vote | accept | Student1981 | ||
Oct 20, 2017 at 16:58 | history | edited | Stéphane Laurent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 245 characters in body
|
Oct 20, 2017 at 16:12 | history | answered | Stéphane Laurent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |