Timeline for Sheaf description of $G$-bundles
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2009 at 23:19 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | I think it's because it's mine, and I asked the question. | |
| Oct 27, 2009 at 21:35 | comment | added | Kevin H. Lin | Why is this answer blue? | |
| Oct 27, 2009 at 17:20 | history | edited | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2009 at 17:20 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | Fair enough. Edited to mention that I'm thinking etale. | |
| Oct 27, 2009 at 16:50 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | actually, you should be incredibly careful with this definition. There are things you want to be principal G-bundles, which are not locally trivial in the Zariski topology (like the map z -> z^2 on A^1-{0}). In the etale/smooth/fppf topology, this is basically fine. | |
| Oct 27, 2009 at 15:59 | history | answered | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |