Timeline for A $t$-test for ordered pairs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 2, 2017 at 12:59 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | It will indeed be so in your case of $2$-independent $X_i$'s, where the sequences $(X_1,\dots,X_j)$ and $(X_{j+2},X_{j+3},\dots)$ are independent, for each $j$. | |
Oct 2, 2017 at 10:26 | vote | accept | Elias Schoof | ||
Oct 2, 2017 at 9:45 | comment | added | Elias Schoof | Thanks! In the notation of Theorem 0 in the paper, is it correct to say that $\rho_n = 0$ for all $n \ge 2$ in my case? | |
Oct 1, 2017 at 20:51 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Oct 1, 2017 at 20:23 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 734 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2017 at 19:53 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |