Timeline for Covering property of complete distributive lattices
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2017 at 16:56 | vote | accept | Dominic van der Zypen | ||
| Oct 2, 2017 at 16:44 | comment | added | Richard Stanley | @DominicvanderZypen: oops, you are right. I have deleted this statement. | |
| Oct 2, 2017 at 16:43 | history | edited | Richard Stanley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted incorrect addendum
|
| Oct 1, 2017 at 6:19 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | @richardstanley, the requirement about the intervals is equivalent to saying the interval topology is $T_2$, and $[0,1]\times[0,1]$ has $T_2$ interval topology, so I am not sure about your example | |
| Sep 29, 2017 at 21:21 | history | edited | Richard Stanley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
addendum added
|
| Sep 29, 2017 at 20:09 | comment | added | Ilya Bogdanov | That said, clearly +1 for a nice example (which is even more than OP asked for) --- which may seem incorrect at the first glance! | |
| Sep 29, 2017 at 20:03 | comment | added | Ilya Bogdanov | $\mathbb Z$ is not a complete lattice. As far as I understand from OP's comment, the author means a complete lattice which is (finitely) distributive... | |
| Sep 29, 2017 at 19:26 | history | answered | Richard Stanley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |