Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
While this was bumped to the top anyway, I did a complete rewrite of the question. The content was preserved, down to the unmotivated detail that the OP requires that the 'main road tree' be *not* a spanning tree. I corrected a downright false detail: the sum was over $V$, not $V\setminus U$.
Source Link
Peter Heinig
  • 6.1k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 47

Reference Request: Designing Main Roadsdesigning a tree of "main roads" in a Graphgraph

Maybe the title is confusing but I can not come up with a more appropriate one. Suppose we haveLet $G = (V, E)$ be an undirected graphfinite $G = (V, E)$connected graph. Let $u$ be a specficspecified vertex inof $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is determineddefined. Now we want to decrease this value, by settingdefining "main roads" in the graph. Imagine

We require that there

  1. these "main roads" must constitute a subtree $T$ of $G$.(note)
  2. $u\in V(T)$
  3. $s:=\lvert V(T)\rvert < \lvert V\rvert$

The idea is a tree $T \subseteq G$ including $u$ and other $n - 1$ vertices ($n < |V|$) in $G$. Walking onthat traversing edges of $T$ needs nois cost. Formally-free, let $U$ satisfying $u \in U \subseteq V$ and $|U|=n$ is connected in $G$ (so actually $U$ isthat therefore the vertex setsize of the sum of distances drops to the sum of distances from vertices outside $T$). We would like to minimize $$ D=\sum_{v \in V} d_G(U,v) $$ for all possible $U$ with certainthe nearest vertex of $n$$T$.

Formally, the aim is to minimize (or course, $d_G(U,v):=\min\{d_G(u,v)\colon u\in U\}$) $$ D=\sum_{v \in V\setminus U} d_G(U,v) $$ over all $U\subseteq V$ with

(bc.1) $\qquad\lvert U\rvert=s<\lvert V\rvert$,

(bc.2) $\qquad G[U]:=(U,\{e\in E\colon e\subset U\})$ is connected.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate $D$ or estimate the minimum of $D$ with tolerable errors?


A counterexample for Manfred's algorithm, in which $u$ is $A$ and $n=4$$s=4$.

counterexample

${}$________________________________

(note) Not spanning tree though, because of condition 3. (Also compare the condition $n<\lvert V\rvert$ in the original version of thie post; there, $n$ unambiguously meant the number of vertices of the tree, so, curiously, the 'main-road-subtree' is required not to be a spanning tree.)

Reference Request: Designing Main Roads of a Graph

Maybe the title is confusing but I can not come up with a more appropriate one. Suppose we have an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$. Let $u$ be a specfic vertex in $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is determined. Now we want to decrease this value, by setting "main roads" in the graph. Imagine that there is a tree $T \subseteq G$ including $u$ and other $n - 1$ vertices ($n < |V|$) in $G$. Walking on edges of $T$ needs no cost. Formally, let $U$ satisfying $u \in U \subseteq V$ and $|U|=n$ is connected in $G$ (so actually $U$ is the vertex set of $T$). We would like to minimize $$ D=\sum_{v \in V} d_G(U,v) $$ for all possible $U$ with certain $n$.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate $D$ or estimate $D$ with tolerable errors?


A counterexample for Manfred's algorithm, in which $u$ is $A$ and $n=4$.

counterexample

Reference Request: designing a tree of "main roads" in a graph

Let $G = (V, E)$ be an undirected finite connected graph. Let $u$ be a specified vertex of $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is defined. Now we want to decrease this value, by defining "main roads" in the graph.

We require that

  1. these "main roads" must constitute a subtree $T$ of $G$.(note)
  2. $u\in V(T)$
  3. $s:=\lvert V(T)\rvert < \lvert V\rvert$

The idea is that traversing edges of $T$ is cost-free, and that therefore the size of the sum of distances drops to the sum of distances from vertices outside $T$ to the nearest vertex of $T$.

Formally, the aim is to minimize (or course, $d_G(U,v):=\min\{d_G(u,v)\colon u\in U\}$) $$ D=\sum_{v \in V\setminus U} d_G(U,v) $$ over all $U\subseteq V$ with

(bc.1) $\qquad\lvert U\rvert=s<\lvert V\rvert$,

(bc.2) $\qquad G[U]:=(U,\{e\in E\colon e\subset U\})$ is connected.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate or estimate the minimum of $D$ with tolerable errors?


A counterexample for Manfred's algorithm, in which $u$ is $A$ and $s=4$.

counterexample

${}$________________________________

(note) Not spanning tree though, because of condition 3. (Also compare the condition $n<\lvert V\rvert$ in the original version of thie post; there, $n$ unambiguously meant the number of vertices of the tree, so, curiously, the 'main-road-subtree' is required not to be a spanning tree.)

Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
added 173 characters in body
Source Link
Lwins
  • 1.6k
  • 10
  • 22

Maybe the title is confusing but I can not come up with a more appropriate one. Suppose we have an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$. Let $u$ be a specfic vertex in $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is determined. Now we want to decrease this value, by setting "main roads" in the graph. Imagine that there is a tree $T \subseteq G$ including $u$ and other $n - 1$ vertices ($n < |V|$) in $G$. Walking on edges of $T$ needs no cost. Formally, let $U$ satisfying $u \in U \subseteq V$ and $|U|=n$ is connected in $G$ (so actually $U$ is the vertex set of $T$). We would like to minimize $$ D=\sum_{v \in V} d_G(U,v) $$ for all possible $U$ with certain $n$.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate $D$ or estimate $D$ with tolerable errors?


A counterexample for Manfred's algorithm, in which $u$ is $A$ and $n=4$.

counterexample

Maybe the title is confusing but I can not come up with a more appropriate one. Suppose we have an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$. Let $u$ be a specfic vertex in $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is determined. Now we want to decrease this value, by setting "main roads" in the graph. Imagine that there is a tree $T \subseteq G$ including $u$ and other $n - 1$ vertices ($n < |V|$) in $G$. Walking on edges of $T$ needs no cost. Formally, let $U$ satisfying $u \in U \subseteq V$ and $|U|=n$ is connected in $G$ (so actually $U$ is the vertex set of $T$). We would like to minimize $$ D=\sum_{v \in V} d_G(U,v) $$ for all possible $U$ with certain $n$.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate $D$ or estimate $D$ with tolerable errors?

Maybe the title is confusing but I can not come up with a more appropriate one. Suppose we have an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$. Let $u$ be a specfic vertex in $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is determined. Now we want to decrease this value, by setting "main roads" in the graph. Imagine that there is a tree $T \subseteq G$ including $u$ and other $n - 1$ vertices ($n < |V|$) in $G$. Walking on edges of $T$ needs no cost. Formally, let $U$ satisfying $u \in U \subseteq V$ and $|U|=n$ is connected in $G$ (so actually $U$ is the vertex set of $T$). We would like to minimize $$ D=\sum_{v \in V} d_G(U,v) $$ for all possible $U$ with certain $n$.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate $D$ or estimate $D$ with tolerable errors?


A counterexample for Manfred's algorithm, in which $u$ is $A$ and $n=4$.

counterexample

The term 'spanning tree' was misused, since such a tree contains all the vertices of the graph.
Source Link

Maybe the title is confusing but I can not come up with a more appropriate one. Suppose we have an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$. Let $u$ be a specfic vertex in $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is determined. Now we want to decrease this value, by setting "main roads" in the graph. Imagine that there is a spanning tree $T$$T \subseteq G$ including $u$ and other $n - 1$ vertices ($n < |V|$) in $G$. Walking on edges of $T$ needs no cost. Formally, let $U$ satisfying $u \in U \subseteq V$ and $|U|=n$ is connected in $G$ (so actually $U$ is the vertex set of $T$). We would like to minimize $$ D=\sum_{v \in V} d_G(U,v) $$ for all possible $U$ with certain $n$.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate $D$ or estimate $D$ with tolerable errors?

Maybe the title is confusing but I can not come up with a more appropriate one. Suppose we have an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$. Let $u$ be a specfic vertex in $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is determined. Now we want to decrease this value, by setting "main roads" in the graph. Imagine that there is a spanning tree $T$ including $u$ and other $n - 1$ vertices ($n < |V|$) in $G$. Walking on edges of $T$ needs no cost. Formally, let $U$ satisfying $u \in U \subseteq V$ and $|U|=n$ is connected in $G$ (so actually $U$ is the vertex set of $T$). We would like to minimize $$ D=\sum_{v \in V} d_G(U,v) $$ for all possible $U$ with certain $n$.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate $D$ or estimate $D$ with tolerable errors?

Maybe the title is confusing but I can not come up with a more appropriate one. Suppose we have an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$. Let $u$ be a specfic vertex in $G$. Then the sum of distances $$ \sum_{v \in V} d_G(u,v) $$ is determined. Now we want to decrease this value, by setting "main roads" in the graph. Imagine that there is a tree $T \subseteq G$ including $u$ and other $n - 1$ vertices ($n < |V|$) in $G$. Walking on edges of $T$ needs no cost. Formally, let $U$ satisfying $u \in U \subseteq V$ and $|U|=n$ is connected in $G$ (so actually $U$ is the vertex set of $T$). We would like to minimize $$ D=\sum_{v \in V} d_G(U,v) $$ for all possible $U$ with certain $n$.

My question. Was this problem studied before? Is there any result of an algorithm to calculate $D$ or estimate $D$ with tolerable errors?

added 1 character in body; edited title
Source Link
Lwins
  • 1.6k
  • 10
  • 22
Loading
Source Link
Lwins
  • 1.6k
  • 10
  • 22
Loading