Timeline for A Learning Roadmap request: From high-school to mid-undergraduate studies
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2018 at 1:57 | history | edited | jeq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copied image to imgur.com, as it was not being displayed because of the new https rule. Added link to original image source.
|
| Feb 5, 2013 at 2:23 | comment | added | SandeepJ | @L Spice, there are specific MSC codes which reveal articles which are expositions; then you have to narrow it down from there For example code 14-02 is "Publications (1973-now) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) " to find all MSC codes for exposition, search for "exposition" in this list ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc.html | |
| Feb 4, 2013 at 20:37 | comment | added | LSpice | @SandeepJ, how does one search on MathSciNet for articles that have won expository awards? | |
| Jul 18, 2010 at 17:47 | comment | added | SandeepJ | Thanks Hans. The series of pictures are hilarious...and exactly how it feels. | |
| Jul 18, 2010 at 16:28 | comment | added | Hans Lundmark | abstrusegoose.com/272 (Click on the image to see the continuation.) | |
| Jun 16, 2010 at 5:08 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | I think the "quantum field theory" node could use several more input arrows, including statistics, distributions, and Lie algebra cohomology. Also, the double and triple fields seem out of place, since they aren't nearly as widely used as the rest of the objects. | |
| Jun 15, 2010 at 23:47 | comment | added | Willie Wong | Yes, for starters, Terry's would at least have PDEs... a much better map is math.niu.edu/~rusin/known-math/index/mathmap.html | |
| Jun 15, 2010 at 23:46 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Buying access to a university library is a good idea, but may not take the place of buying some texts. In the university libraries of my experience, the classic texts discussed in the other answers would be perpetually checked out. | |
| Jun 15, 2010 at 12:22 | comment | added | SandeepJ | agree... i shouldn't have said "all". I wish someone (Terence Tao?) would come up with such a mind-map though. | |
| Jun 15, 2010 at 10:56 | comment | added | PersonX | I agree with Andrew Stacey. That's a cool diagram, but it's from the viewpoint of physics as the only end goal. | |
| Jun 15, 2010 at 9:51 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | All math? I think not! | |
| Jun 15, 2010 at 6:48 | comment | added | Unknown | Wow! How spectacular to the eye! | |
| Jun 14, 2010 at 22:24 | history | answered | SandeepJ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |