Timeline for Theorem 3.5.2, page 177 of Mumford's Red Book
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2017 at 8:41 | vote | accept | Gheehyun Nahm | ||
| Sep 12, 2017 at 2:11 | answer | added | Gheehyun Nahm | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 12, 2017 at 2:05 | comment | added | Gheehyun Nahm | @roy smith Thank you, I figured this out; the only error here seems to be what you mentioned. I was puzzled beforehand since the proceeding argument did not seem to be clear at first glance... | |
| Sep 11, 2017 at 18:08 | comment | added | roy smith | This republished and retypeset book is notorious for its many misprints. In the original redbook, that local ring is stated to be not the ideal of Z, but the original complete local ring O. I have not read this proof, so do not know if this solves the problem, but possibly this may help. | |
| Sep 11, 2017 at 16:48 | history | edited | Gheehyun Nahm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 11, 2017 at 15:56 | history | asked | Gheehyun Nahm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |