Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 29, 2022 at 7:49 answer added Elliot Glazer timeline score: 2
Sep 12, 2017 at 16:57 answer added Alexander Pruss timeline score: 4
Sep 11, 2017 at 16:54 history edited Alexander Pruss CC BY-SA 3.0
removed duplication
Sep 11, 2017 at 16:18 history edited Alexander Pruss CC BY-SA 3.0
cleaned up
Sep 11, 2017 at 16:16 comment added Alexander Pruss Sorry, I had forgotten how the construction went (I came up with it a couple of years ago). I now edited to include the correct construction, but yours is neater and more illuminating, I think.
Sep 11, 2017 at 16:12 history edited Alexander Pruss CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed bad construction
Sep 11, 2017 at 16:00 comment added Alex Kruckman But I think you can still get a nonmeasurable subset of $\Omega$ with property $H$ by fixing a non-measurable subset $X\subseteq \{0,1\}^{\omega_+}$ and letting $A = \{0\eta\mid \eta\in X\}\cup \{1\eta\mid \eta\notin X\}$.
Sep 11, 2017 at 15:59 comment added Alex Kruckman Are you sure about your construction of a non-measurable set $A$ with property $H$? $A$ contains exactly one binary sequence with a finite even number of $1$s and exactly one binary sequence with a finite odd number of $1$s (call this number $j$). Then for any $n$, $\rho_n(A)$ contains exactly one binary sequence with a finite even number of $1$s, and that number is either $j+1$ or $j-1$. So $A\cup \rho_n(A)$ contains at most $2$ sequences with a finite even number of $1$s, and the union can't be all of $\Omega$.
Sep 11, 2017 at 14:57 history asked Alexander Pruss CC BY-SA 3.0