Skip to main content

Timeline for How to draw a random normal matrix?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 6, 2017 at 8:58 vote accept Domin
Sep 3, 2017 at 19:28 answer added Adrien Hardy timeline score: 4
Sep 1, 2017 at 12:58 comment added Domin @Marcel Yes, I did. It is relatively easy to draw a complex random normal matrix (as CarloBeenakker points out), however I would like the matrix to have only real entries.
Sep 1, 2017 at 6:53 comment added Carlo Beenakker @Marcel --- please correct me if I'm wrong, but if I decompose $A=UDU^\dagger$ with $U$ orthogonal then $A$ is symmetric; I presume the OP wants real normal matrices that are not symmetric (otherwise the question is trivial)
Sep 1, 2017 at 4:49 comment added Domin @NateEldredge Yes, I know. The motivation is simply this. Imagine, there is a matrix equality for normal real matrices you would like to prove or disprove. Before you get to work. you might want to try a random series of matrices of some size and computationally check whether the equality holds. I am not after any particular distribution, but definitely it should not be sigular w.r.t. the natural measure inherited from $R^{n\times n}$. In other words, each normal matrix should have a chance of being drawn.
Aug 31, 2017 at 22:57 comment added Marcel @CarloBeenakker no, the papers I mean interpret "normal" in the sense of the question (although I think the ensembles are indeed Gaussian). Also, to make your $A$ real one just draws random orthogonal matrices, no?
Aug 31, 2017 at 22:00 comment added Igor Rivin @CarloBeenakker What is the distribution of the coefficients of this?
Aug 31, 2017 at 21:07 comment added Carlo Beenakker @Marcel --- I presume these papers you are referring to all interpret "normal" as "Gaussian" --- which is a different kettle of fish --- for complex normal matrices I would just draw a random unitary $U$ and a random diagonal matrix $D$ and write $A=UDU^\dagger$ --- no idea how to impose the constraint that $A$ is real...
Aug 31, 2017 at 20:57 comment added Marcel There are many papers about "random normal matrices". Have you googled this?
Aug 31, 2017 at 20:54 comment added Nate Eldredge "Random" only makes sense when you specify a probability distribution. Which one do you want? There isn't any canonical choice, AFAIK.
Aug 31, 2017 at 19:53 review First posts
Aug 31, 2017 at 20:06
Aug 31, 2017 at 19:50 history asked Domin CC BY-SA 3.0