Skip to main content
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
user111
  • 4k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 33

Yes, indeed, Birkhoff-James orthogonality is an orthogonality in the sense of Rätz. A proof appears on p.36 of

J. Rätz, On orthogonally additive mappings, Aequations Math. 28 (1985), 35-49.

The argument there is a refinement of the proof given on p.188 of

K. Sundaresan, Orthogonality and nonlinear functionals on Banach spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (1972), 187-190.

Since it is a non trivial proof, I will not give more details about it in this postjust refer the interested reader to the above papers.

Yes, indeed, Birkhoff-James orthogonality is an orthogonality in the sense of Rätz. A proof appears on p.36 of

J. Rätz, On orthogonally additive mappings, Aequations Math. 28 (1985), 35-49.

The argument there is a refinement of the proof given on p.188 of

K. Sundaresan, Orthogonality and nonlinear functionals on Banach spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (1972), 187-190.

Since it is a non trivial proof, I will not give more details about it in this post.

Yes, indeed, Birkhoff-James orthogonality is an orthogonality in the sense of Rätz. A proof appears on p.36 of

J. Rätz, On orthogonally additive mappings, Aequations Math. 28 (1985), 35-49.

The argument there is a refinement of the proof given on p.188 of

K. Sundaresan, Orthogonality and nonlinear functionals on Banach spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (1972), 187-190.

Since it is a non trivial proof, I just refer the interested reader to the above papers.

Source Link
user111
  • 4k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 33

Yes, indeed, Birkhoff-James orthogonality is an orthogonality in the sense of Rätz. A proof appears on p.36 of

J. Rätz, On orthogonally additive mappings, Aequations Math. 28 (1985), 35-49.

The argument there is a refinement of the proof given on p.188 of

K. Sundaresan, Orthogonality and nonlinear functionals on Banach spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (1972), 187-190.

Since it is a non trivial proof, I will not give more details about it in this post.