Timeline for Does $R$ is Dedekind-finite imply $\mathbb{M}_n(R)$ is Dedekind-finite
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 14, 2022 at 23:55 | vote | accept | Cubic Bear | ||
| Sep 14, 2022 at 23:55 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2022 at 21:03 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed typos
|
| Sep 7, 2022 at 16:51 | answer | added | Salvo Tringali | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 16:59 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @DavidHandelman Oops: I didn't think to search previous answers for the terminology "Hopfian". I see I've duplicated the answer you gave | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 14:34 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 26, 2017 at 16:31 | |||||
| Aug 26, 2017 at 14:14 | comment | added | David Handelman | Possible duplicate of Hopfian modules | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 6:42 | vote | accept | Cubic Bear | ||
| S Sep 14, 2022 at 23:55 | |||||
| Aug 26, 2017 at 4:34 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
Removed deprecated (abstract-algebra) tag - see the tag info: https://mathoverflow.net/tags/abstract-algebra/info
|
|
| Aug 26, 2017 at 3:07 | answer | added | Yemon Choi | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 1:05 | history | edited | Cubic Bear | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
gramma mistake
|
| Aug 26, 2017 at 0:55 | history | asked | Cubic Bear | CC BY-SA 3.0 |