Timeline for Constant $a$ such that $[a^n]$ is always prime for $n\in N^+$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 24, 2017 at 23:40 | vote | accept | Milin | ||
Aug 24, 2017 at 15:52 | comment | added | user41593 | I should add that this is comparatively much harder than Mills's theorem, just as Mills's relies on much deeper results than for Wright's constant (spacing between successive primes vs. Bertrand's postulate); an argument for not expecting such an $\alpha$ is that if you run an analogous argument you need an estimate on primes which is too good to be true. | |
Aug 24, 2017 at 15:30 | history | answered | user41593 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |