Timeline for A Rokhlin lemma with a prescribed height function?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2017 at 13:28 | comment | added | Jairo Bochi | I incorporate the generalized Rokhlin Lemma and applications in these notes: www.mat.uc.cl/~jairo.bochi/docs/ergodic_yet_again.pdf | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 14:41 | comment | added | Jairo Bochi | @AnthonyQuas So the answer is positive! Thanks for your solution! A nice application of the lemma is that it allows for a very short and obvious proof of the Maximal Ergodic Theorem. (Actually the bounded version also implies the MET, but in that case the argument is slightly less clean.) | |
| S Aug 27, 2017 at 11:49 | history | bounty ended | Jairo Bochi | ||
| S Aug 27, 2017 at 11:49 | history | notice removed | Jairo Bochi | ||
| Aug 27, 2017 at 11:49 | vote | accept | Jairo Bochi | ||
| Aug 26, 2017 at 15:10 | answer | added | Anthony Quas | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 20:39 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | I suspect the answer is no. I've been thinking about a construction, and will report if it works out... | |
| S Aug 25, 2017 at 14:36 | history | bounty started | Jairo Bochi | ||
| S Aug 25, 2017 at 14:36 | history | notice added | Jairo Bochi | Draw attention | |
| Aug 23, 2017 at 19:41 | history | edited | Jairo Bochi |
added tag
|
|
| Aug 23, 2017 at 13:52 | history | asked | Jairo Bochi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |