Timeline for Gluing Schemes along subschemes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2019 at 21:33 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 25, 2017 at 3:18 | history | edited | Pace Nielsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 24, 2017 at 16:44 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 16:44 | history | edited | user100841 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 409 characters in body
|
| Aug 25, 2017 at 16:20 | answer | added | Jim Bryan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 12:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 20, 2017 at 18:55 | |||||
| Aug 20, 2017 at 12:43 | comment | added | user100841 | I am saying the glued up scheme is also quasi projective | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 12:38 | comment | added | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | I don't understand the question. If $\bar X$ is the blow up of $X$ at the origin, then it's clearly quasi-projective since $X$ is. | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 6:47 | history | asked | user100841 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |