Timeline for Non-negative integer solutions of a single Linear Diophantine Equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2022 at 21:44 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | @TheAmplitwist this was written 12 years ago so I am not too sure, but probably the two articles are doi.org/10.1007/s11853-008-0021-4 and doi.org/10.1007/s11040-006-9010-3 | |
| Jun 17, 2022 at 14:58 | comment | added | The Amplitwist |
The links to springerlink.com are broken. Perhaps you could take a look, whenever possible…
|
|
| Apr 16, 2011 at 8:34 | comment | added | Anirbit | @Vladimir Oh..sorry..I was not accounting for the "-1". The number you quote is the minimum number that is representable and hence the Frobenius number would be one less than that. Okay! | |
| Apr 13, 2011 at 22:13 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | Huh? $ab-a-b=(a-1)(b-1)-1$, so these two statements match perfectly. | |
| Apr 12, 2011 at 16:03 | comment | added | Anirbit | @Vladimir In the answer by Pete on another question on MathOverflow mathoverflow.net/questions/19587/… , there seems to be a claim that Sylvester had shown that for the two variable case the Frobenius number is precisely $ab-a-b$ (in your notation) Doesn't that contradict what you saying in the two variable case? | |
| Jul 8, 2010 at 16:18 | vote | accept | TGM | ||
| Jul 8, 2010 at 16:17 | vote | accept | TGM | ||
| Jul 8, 2010 at 16:17 | |||||
| Jun 11, 2010 at 23:36 | history | answered | Vladimir Dotsenko | CC BY-SA 2.5 |