Timeline for Does every compact metric space have a canonical probability measure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Aug 10, 2017 at 4:34 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo in title.
|
| Aug 10, 2017 at 3:13 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 10, 2017 at 4:34 | |||||
| Aug 10, 2017 at 1:45 | vote | accept | M. Kelly | ||
| Aug 10, 2017 at 1:45 | history | edited | M. Kelly | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed title, added
|
| Aug 10, 2017 at 1:31 | comment | added | M. Kelly | @AntonPetrunin, you're completely right. Thanks for pointing out my error. @R W thank you for providing an example showing that there may be several limit points. I'll add a note at the end of my post asking the question and accepting your answer. | |
| Aug 9, 2017 at 21:37 | answer | added | R W | timeline score: 17 | |
| Aug 9, 2017 at 20:44 | comment | added | R W | @AntonPetrunin Yes - it seems so. The only relevant part of Naor's exposition is the fact that any two minimal $\epsilon$-nets are $2\epsilon$-close. | |
| Aug 9, 2017 at 19:58 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | The construction depends on the choice of the sequence $\varepsilon_n\to 0$, is not it? So you can not say that the measure is canonical. | |
| Aug 9, 2017 at 19:40 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 9, 2017 at 19:43 | |||||
| Aug 9, 2017 at 19:39 | history | asked | M. Kelly | CC BY-SA 3.0 |