Timeline for question regarding Faltings' proof of the Tate conjecture for Abelian varieties over number fields
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 26, 2017 at 16:14 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=19475 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
Sep 26, 2017 at 15:53 | answer | added | user19475 | timeline score: 3 | |
S Aug 20, 2017 at 11:09 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Aug 20, 2017 at 11:09 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Aug 12, 2017 at 16:25 | comment | added | user19475 | @ulrich: Why don't you make your comment into an answer? | |
Aug 12, 2017 at 10:59 | comment | added | naf | Faltings uses a weaker finiteness theorem than Milne does and then uses Zarhin's trick to prove the statement for any invariant isotropic subspace. If one wants to use Zarhin's trick directly then one must first prove that any abelian variety has only finitely many direct factors (up to isomorphism). | |
S Aug 12, 2017 at 9:24 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
S Aug 12, 2017 at 9:24 | history | notice added | user19475 | Draw attention | |
Aug 7, 2017 at 18:06 | history | asked | user19475 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |