Skip to main content
spelling, grammar
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102

Is there any geometric or more direct conceptual way to understand a supersymmetry algebra, rather than staringstarting from a lagrangianLagrangian including boson and fermion fields, deriving all the expressions ensuring the supersymmetricsupersymmetry invariance and then writing down the supersymmetry algebra.? For a geometric/algebraic or algebraic way, I mean to (at least partially) derive the supersymmetry algebra from pure(or partially) geometry  (spinors, spin group, etc.etc). Thanks.

Is there any geometric or more direct conceptual way to understand supersymmetry algebra, rather than staring from a lagrangian including boson and fermion fields, deriving all the expressions ensuring the supersymmetric invariance and then writing down the supersymmetry algebra. For geometric/algebraic way I mean to derive the supersymmetry algebra from pure(or partially) geometry(spinors, spin group,.etc). Thanks.

Is there any geometric or more direct conceptual way to understand a supersymmetry algebra, rather than starting from a Lagrangian including boson and fermion fields, deriving all the expressions ensuring the supersymmetry invariance and then writing down the supersymmetry algebra? For a geometric or algebraic way, I mean to (at least partially) derive the supersymmetry algebra from pure geometry  (spinors, spin group, etc.).

edited tags
Link
Hao Yu
  • 781
  • 4
  • 13
Loading
Source Link
Hao Yu
  • 781
  • 4
  • 13
Loading